The birth of hatred

People are generally lazy by nature.  Procrastination is a trait that affects everyone.  There are few things more powerful as a motivator than a tight deadline.  They are even more effective when there are great consequences attached to the due date.

It should come as no surprise that social and political movements take advantage of this human weakness.  Rhetoric for every cause uses the innate laziness found in man as a primary tool to spread their message and magnify its percieved importance.  Regardless of the issue’s real size, every ill in society must be made far worse.  Otherwise, nobody will care to address it.  After all, there are many other issues that need to be addressed.  Many of them far more dire and wide ranging than the ones that get actual attention.

This is observable any time an issue rises to prominence in modernity.  In order for people to care about national debt, politicians must scream about how it will bring about the end of the nation.  For a charity to get donations to help African poverity, they must plead that millions will die of hunger and of genocide without their help.  Preachers must speak of eternal damnation and hellfire to get people to repent their sins.

The human attraction to these arguments stems from the innate tendencies to think in black and white terms.  There is little room for gradation in most politics and religion.  Something must be right or left, good or evil, heaven or hell.  Discourse about large, nebulous topics must be forced into categories humans can easily agree or disagree with.  Otherwise, they are easily forgotten.  It is the only way people can deal with topics beyond the scope of the commonplace.

This uncomfortable separation into discrete categories is the source of almost all disagreement.  These categories have meaning to the individual and the group for them to be useful.  They are influenced and colored by all of his experiences and all that he has learned.  While two people might be talking about the same thing using the same words and phrases, the conception behind it can be entirely different and thereby lead confusion.

Modernity thrives on this basic misunderstanding.  Multiculturalism and globalization bring together people with vastly different experiences and beliefs. The fact that most people are packed into crowded cities only exacerbates the effect.  To a Muslim, the hijab and burka are seen as symbols of purity, chastity, and temperance.  To a westerner, it is seen as a symbol of sexual oppression.  In truth, it is neither.  It is only a piece of cloth.  The meaning each person gives it is what breeds resentment.

As a result, modernity brings about conflict and anomiosity at the most basic of interactions.  People deal with this by retreating to places where they can be understood. The best way to avoid conflict is simply to remove oneself from the circumstances that cause it.  The bonds of neighborhood and community break down until society becomes a dog-eat-dog world where every man must fend for himself.  Once cooperation is no longer present the simple foundations of a society, to live in it becomes more trouble than it is worth.

Only through great effort can somebody see the perspective of another.  Even then, it is often only a superficial understanding and prone to error.  It is an unnatural way to think about the world.  Most people are incapable of “putting themselves in someone else’s shoes” at a basic level. Modern societies operate on a level that are ignorant of basic human nature.  Mankind has got to know its limitations.  Only then can it overcome them.


5 responses to “The birth of hatred

  1. Wow, Yes. That was powerful:”Modernity thrives on this basic misunderstanding”. That is so true. I think that procrastination is a lot of people’s misunderstood intuition coming into play. Letting them know that what they are doing, saying, even trying to believe… is false. Of course, most people ignore this (intuitive sense). Thus is the world. A lot of confused and lost people. Yes, even some with great intentions. A lot of Christians and the like thrive on the statement: Put yourself in someone else’s shoes. As you say, this is pretty much near impossible, because even though you may have experienced similar things, you shall never feel as the other person does; you simply are NOT them. As a youth, I wore myself out saying to many people: You’ll never truly understand. As an adult, I now see I was right. My thought processes were on a completely different plane. People do, as you say remove themselves to be able to deal with this chaos. This leads to an endless cycle of I don’t care. I don’t care about you, or to even try to change. Politicians definitely thrive on this chaos, after all they are sociopathic. Which in turn, the confused individual will eat up any garbage so that they may easily not have to sit and think things through. So that they may go back to their pathetic existence and “live” another day just to get up and repeat the endless cycle. I cannot understand this existence. How can someone “live” like that? However, I must disagree with one point…I don’t think people are lazy “by nature”. I think this is a “learned” trait. Perhaps over time, these genes have been “turned on” in order to deal with the chaos of the world (modernity). Being lazy(by nature, in nature) would only cause a quick death. In order to thrive in the harsh environment that is nature, one must constantly work to survive. This is why now, in modernity we see so many lazy people in my opinion. The genes have adapted to our detriment. Thus, the “procrastination gene” is born. Perhaps there was some archaic form of procrastination, but it was only in the sense that you had to put certain tasks off in order to be able to focus on that which was essential to survive. That is stretch though. Procrastination is a cancer of the soul. Anyhow, the article was very insightful! Thanks for taking the time to write it.


    • Yes, that is an important distinction. Most people are only lazy towards things they don’t fully understand the consequences of. When something provides immediate feedback, it is much harder to ignore and put off. Procrastination might be best described as a lack of foresight. It’s an ability which gets more obscure and harder to come by the more complex modern society becomes.

  2. Pingback: Prophets of doom | NOVUS SÆCULUM OBSCURUM

  3. Pingback: Putting the rage in suffrage | NOVUS SÆCULUM OBSCURUM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s